Report
Young People and Gambling 2022: Official statistics
Gambling Commission report produced by Ipsos on young people and their gambling behaviour, attitudes and awareness in 2022.
Contents
- Executive summary
- Young people’s active involvement in gambling
- Summary
- Young people's active involvement in gambling
- Variations in active involvement in gambling
- Variations in active involvement in types of gambling activities
- Prevalence of non-problem, at risk or problem gambling
- Problem gambling by gender
- Problem gambling by age
- Problem gambling by ethnicity
- Experience of gambling
- Summary
- Overall gambling experience
- Overall gambling experience in the last 12 months
- Variations in gambling experience
- The Impact of gambling on young people
- Summary
- How gambling impacts on relations with friends and family
- How gambling makes young people feel
- The impact of gambling on sleep
- The impact of gambling on spending
- The impact of gambling on schoolwork
- Experience and impact of family members’ gambling
- Online gambling
- Summary
- Young people’s active involvement in online gambling
- Overall experience of online gambling
- Online gambling using parent's or guardian's accounts
- Awareness and use of in-game items in video games
- National Lottery play
- Summary
- Young people’s active involvement with lottery products
- Wider experience of lottery games
- Buying a National Lottery draw ticket or scratchcard
- Who young people are with when playing a National Lottery product?
- Games and gaming machines
- Summary
- Young people’s active involvement in games and gaming machines
- Overall experience of games and gaming machines play
- Who is with young people when they play gaming machines?
- Types of gaming machines
- Play in an adults-only area
- The Context for gambling participation
- Summary
- Setting gambling in the context of other risk-taking behaviours
- Setting gambling in the context of other activities
- Reasons why young people gamble
- Why young people don’t gamble
- Who young people were with when they gambled
- Attitudes towards and exposure to gambling
- Summary
- Young people’s views on gambling
- Feeling informed about gambling
- Being stopped from gambling
- Young people’s exposure to gambling adverts and promotions and frequency of exposure
- Content of gambling adverts and promotions seen
- Whether ever prompted to gamble by adverts and promotions
- Following gambling companies on social media
- Appendices
- List of gambling activities and definitions
Research design
Trend data
Since 2011, the Gambling Commission and Ipsos have conducted an annual survey into the gambling behaviours of young people aged 11 to 16 years of age in Great Britain. This report delivers the results from the 2022 survey, which explores young people’s current rates of participation in gambling.
Previously the survey drew on trend data to illustrate how gambling behaviours and attitudes have changed over time. However, the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and resulting closure of schools, suspended fieldwork early in 2020, and prevented the 2021 survey from going ahead. The Commission used this enforced hiatus in the survey time series as an opportunity to improving what we knew about young people and gambling on 2021.
The 2021 questionnaire development work made a number of recommendations to change the questionnaire where responses indicated that questions were not well understood or were at the risk of becoming outdated.
The subsequent changes to the 2022 survey questionnaire have ensured that the study is composed of a set of questions that will improve the quality of official statistics around gambling participation amongst children and young people. However, this does constitute a break in trend data and so the 2022 report only provides data for the current years’ survey.
Sampling
The Young People Omnibus (YPO) survey aims to represent pupils in curriculum years 7 to 11 (S1 to S5 Scotland).
The survey invites pupils to take part who are attending academies (public funded schools held accountable through a legally binding ‘funding agreement’ in England) and maintained (overseen, or ‘maintained’ by the Local Authority) secondary and middle-deemed secondary schools in England, Wales and Scotland.
To enable this a three-stage sampling process was used.
Stage 1
In England and Wales, a sample of schools were selected from Department for Education’s ‘Get Information About Schools’ database (a comprehensive listing of secondary schools in England and Wales). Special schools and sixth form colleges were excluded. The sample frame was stratified by Government Office Region (GOR), and, within each stratum, schools were selected proportional to the number of pupils attending the school. In total 436 schools were selected to participate in the survey.
In Scotland, a sample of 34 schools was selected from the Scottish Government’s school contacts database. The sample was stratified by Local Authority and school size.
Stage 2
One curriculum year group (Year 7-Year 11/ S1 – S5) was selected at random for each school.
Stage 3
In the specified curriculum year group, schools were asked to nominate two mixed ability class groups to take part. In two schools only one class was able to take part, reflecting pupil or teacher absence on the day that the survey took place. All members of the randomly selected class group were selected to fill out the self-completion survey.
Recruiting schools
To maintain comparability, the sampling of schools has remained consistent year on year. However, the way in which schools are recruited has evolved to respond to technological developments and most recently in respect to the demands that were placed on schools during the coronavirus pandemic.
Advance packs
All schools in the main sample for England and Wales received an invitation pack in early February 2022. The pack included a letter informing them about the survey, a leaflet containing more information on how the data is used and contact details for the Ipsos Young People Omnibus team. The packs are addressed to a named head teacher.
In Scotland, the first step was to send a letter to local authorities which contain schools in the sample frame. Local authorities were informed about the survey and given the option to opt out of the research, on behalf of schools in their area. In total 24 Scottish local authorities were contacted, and three opted out of the survey. Selected schools in the remaining 21 local authorities were then sent the invitation letter and information sheet.
Contacting schools
Schools’ recruitment at Ipsos is managed by our team of experienced recruiters. At the start of February 2022, the Ipsos Young People Omnibus research team conducted a briefing via Microsoft Teams to inform recruiters about the survey content, update them of any changes, and share ideas and tips for encouraging participation.
Recruiters were allocated samples in batches, which contains a mix of regions (to avoid bias). The sample included contact details for the school. Where possible, recruiters sought to enrich this by looking at the school website to try and obtain a named contact or direct email address.
Recruiters made contact with all schools in their sample to:
- gain headteacher consent for the school to participate
- collect contact details for a liaison person within the school (usually the teacher for a selected class)
- select one class from each nominated curriculum year group for the school
- arrange a time and date when each class will take part in the online survey.
Recruiters managed this process by using an electronic booking system, which the research team also access to monitor the response rate.
Over the years incentives have become an essential addition to protecting the response rate, particularly in London. They also help encourage schools to choose to participate in the YPO over other surveys, which offer cash incentives.
In 2022, all schools participating in the YPO were offered a £100 cash incentive. Schools were also given a teaching pack, containing free data and example exercises to use in their classes, and an infographic A3 poster highlighting key findings from YPO surveys to display in class.
Once a school agreed to participate a confirmation email was sent, providing schools with their individual online survey link, a template for letters to parents and further information to administer the survey.
Fieldwork for the study was conducted from 14th March to 1st July 2022.
Response rate
In total, from a sample frame of 470 schools in England, Scotland and Wales, 60 took part in the 2022 YPO survey, giving a school response rate of 13 percent.
Overall, 2,559 pupils aged 11-16 years of age from 118 class groups completed the survey online: an average of 22 pupils per class.
The school response rate has decreased gradually year-on-year, but the 2022 survey was particularly low as a result of the coronavirus pandemic and specifically the omicron wave which affected schools after the festive period of 2021.
The feedback Ipsos received from schools during the initial recruitment stages was that they continued to be affected by staff and pupil absence, making participation in the survey almost entirely impossible. As such the recruitment phase was delayed until after the February 2022 half-term, much later that in previous years.
The following table as shown in Table A.2: Number of telephone calls for purposes of school recruitment, provides details of the number of telephone calls recruiters made to individual schools.
Table A.2: Number of telephone calls for purposes of school recruitment
Number of calls made | Number of schools |
---|---|
Under 5 | 64 |
5 to 10 | 124 |
Over 10 | 40 |
Of the schools who did refuse to take part, the most common reason given was that they were too busy – commonly citing the continued demands that the pandemic was making on staff and lesson time.
Weighting
Data are weighted by gender, age and region. The weights were derived from data supplied by the following sources:
- for England, the Department for Education: Schools pupils and their characteristics 2021 (opens in new tab)
- for Wales: Pupil Level Annual School Census (PLASC), Welsh Government (opens in new tab)
- for Scotland: Scottish Government’s school contacts database (opens in new tab)
The effect of weighting is shown in the Table A.5: Sample profile 2022 within the Sample profile section.
Statistical reliability
The respondents to the questionnaire are only samples of the total population, so we cannot be certain that the figures obtained are exactly those we would have if everybody had been interviewed (the true values).
We can, however, predict the variation between the sample results and the true values from knowledge of the size of the samples on which the results are based and the number of times that a particular answer is given. The confidence with which we can make this prediction is usually chosen to be 95 percent - that is, the chances are 95 in 100 that the true value will fall within a specified range.
The following table as shown in Table A.3: Approximate sampling tolerances by sample size, illustrates the predicted ranges for different sample sizes and percentage results at the 95 percent confidence interval.
Table A.3: Approximate sampling tolerances by sample size
Size of sample on which survey results is based | Approximate sampling tolerances applicable to percentages at or near these levels | ||
---|---|---|---|
10 or 90 percent | 30 or 70 percent | 50 percent | |
Plus or minus | Plus or minus | Plus or minus | |
100 interviews | 6 | 9 | 10 |
500 interviews | 3 | 4 | 4 |
1,000 interviews | 2 | 3 | 3 |
2,599 interviews (Young People Omnibus respondents, 2022) | 1 | 2 | 2 |
For example, with a sample of 2,599 where 30 percent give a particular answer, the chances are 95 in 100 that the 'true' value (which would have been obtained if the whole population had been interviewed) will fall within the range of plus or minus 2 percentage points from the sample result.
Strictly speaking the tolerances shown here apply only to random samples, although they offer an approximation for the complex design used by the current study.
When results are compared between separate groups within a sample, different results may be obtained. The difference may be 'real', or it may occur by chance because not everyone in the population has been interviewed.
To test if the difference is a real one, that is to say if it is 'statistically significant', we again have to know the size of the samples, the percentage giving a certain answer and the degree of confidence chosen. If we assume the '95 percent confidence interval', the differences between the two sample results must be greater than the values given in the following table as shown in Table A.4: Differences required for significance.
Table A.4: Differences required for significance
Size of sample compared | Differences required for significance at or near these percentage levels | ||
---|---|---|---|
10 or 90 percent | 30 or 70 percent | 50 percent | |
Plus or minus | Plus or minus | Plus or minus | |
100 and 100 | 8 | 13 | 14 |
250 and 100 | 7 | 11 | 12 |
500 and 250 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
500 and 500 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
1,000 and 500 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
1,000 and 1,000 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
1,500 and 1,000 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
Applying the DSM-IV-MR-J problem gambler screen Next section
Sample profile
Last updated: 31 October 2024
Show updates to this content
Formatting changes corrected only.