Cookies on the Gambling Commission website

The Gambling Commission website uses cookies to make the site work better for you. Some of these cookies are essential to how the site functions and others are optional. Optional cookies help us remember your settings, measure your use of the site and personalise how we communicate with you. Any data collected is anonymised and we do not set optional cookies unless you consent.

Set cookie preferences

You've accepted all cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Skip to main content
  1. Public Register
  2. Businesses
  3. DK Crown Holdings Inc

DK Crown Holdings Inc

Account number

42475

Head office address

222 Berkeley Street,
Boston, 02116, USA

Regulatory actions

Sanction
What is a sanction?

When a licence holder has not followed rules and regulations aimed at ensuring gambling is fair, safe and crime-free, we can take action and impose the following sanctions:

  • Give the licensee a warning
  • Add, remove, or amend a condition to the licence
  • Suspend a licence
  • Revoke a licence
  • Impose a financial penalty

Decision date: 12 September 2024

Outcomes: Financial penalty

Details of action

Following an investigation into a key event submission by DK Crown Holdings Inc (“the Licensee”), the Gambling Commission (“the Commission”) found that the Licensee breached:  

  • Social Responsibility Code Provision (“SRCP”) 3.5.3(1) – Self-exclusion  

The failure to comply with a SRCP is a breach of a licence condition by virtue of section 82(1) of the Gambling Act 2005 (“the Act”).

In line with the Commission’s Licensing, compliance and enforcement policy statement and the Statement of principles for determining financial penalties, the Commission has decided to impose a financial penalty of £28,750 under section 121(1) of the Act.

Commission Officials note that the Licensee identified the breach and proactively reported it to the Commission. The Licensee took immediate remedial action to address the identified issues and co-operated with the Commission throughout the investigation. The Commission also notes that the SRCP breach relates to a specific exceptional issue and that the Licensee’s self-exclusion procedures, in general, continued to operate.

Is this page useful?
Back to top