Cookies on the Gambling Commission website

The Gambling Commission website uses cookies to make the site work better for you. Some of these cookies are essential to how the site functions and others are optional. Optional cookies help us remember your settings, measure your use of the site and personalise how we communicate with you. Any data collected is anonymised and we do not set optional cookies unless you consent.

Set cookie preferences

You've accepted all cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Skip to main content
  1. Public Register
  2. Businesses
  3. Merkur Slots UK Limited

Merkur Slots UK Limited

Account number

3266

Head office address

Second Floor, Matrix House, North Fourth Street,
Milton Keynes, MK9 1NJ, United Kingdom

Regulatory actions

Sanction
What is a sanction?

When a licence holder has not followed rules and regulations aimed at ensuring gambling is fair, safe and crime-free, we can take action and impose the following sanctions:

  • Give the licensee a warning
  • Add, remove, or amend a condition to the licence
  • Suspend a licence
  • Revoke a licence
  • Impose a financial penalty

Decision date: 24 January 2025

Outcomes: Financial penalty

Details of action

Following an investigation outside of a licence review, the Gambling Commission (“the Commission”) found that Merkur Slots UK Limited (“the Licensee”) breached:  

  • Social Responsibility Code Provision (“SRCP”) 3.4.1 (1) (a) and (b) – Premises-based customer interaction

The failure to comply with a SRCP is a breach of a licence condition by virtue of section 82(1) of the Gambling Act 2005 (“the Act”).

In line with the Commission’s Licensing, compliance and enforcement policy statement and the Statement of principles for determining financial penalties, the Commission has decided to impose a financial penalty of £95,450 under section 121(1) of the Act.

Commission Officials acknowledge that the Licensee has co-operated with the Commission throughout the investigation. The Commission also notes the Licensee had, and continues to have, policies and procedures in place regarding SRCP 3.4.1, and that the failure was due to premises staff not implementing the policies and procedures effectively. The Licensee has taken remedial action to address this issue.

Is this page useful?
Back to top