Cookies on the Gambling Commission website

The Gambling Commission website uses cookies to make the site work better for you. Some of these cookies are essential to how the site functions and others are optional. Optional cookies help us remember your settings, measure your use of the site and personalise how we communicate with you. Any data collected is anonymised and we do not set optional cookies unless you consent.

Set cookie preferences

You've accepted all cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Skip to main content

Guidance

Consumer Perceptions of the Complaints Process

Consumer Perceptions of the Complaints Process

Scenario 2

“Imagine you’ve placed a bet on a football match. You think the bet should have been a winner, but after 24 hours the winnings have not appeared in your account. There is no explanation as to why.”

Likelihood of making a complaint

I would make a complaint to the gambling company in this situation scenario 2 - a bar chart made up of 6 vertical bars

Strongly AgreeAgreeNeitherDisagreeStrongly DisagreeDon’t Know
50%26%10%2%1%11%
Source: Yonder Quarterly Online Tracker - June 2021 Base: n=1480 Respondents aged 18+ who have gambled in the past 12 months

The majority (76%) of gamblers agreed that if they were in a situation whereby they weren’t awarded winnings for what they think should be a winning bet, they would make a complaint to the gambling company. This was particularly the case amongst males, those aged 35-64 and moderate risk gamblers.

Agree to making a complaint in this situation scenario 2 - a bar chart made up of 14 vertical bars.

NET AgreeBase size
Total76%1480
Male79%708
Female73%772
18-2473%152
25-3472%251
35-4477%248
45-5477%293
55-6481%233
65+75%303
Non-problem gambler76%962
Low-risk gambler73%226
Moderate risk gambler80%148
Problem gambler73%144
Made a complaint86%197
Source: Yonder Quarterly Online Tracker - June 2021

Reasons for agreeing to make a complaint to the gambling company

The majority of gamblers (around 1,100) in the sample agreed that they’d make a complaint in this situation. The general consensus amongst respondents is that making a complaint is that it’s ‘the right thing to do’, that they placed the bet and were correct, and so they are entitled to receive the money. Attitudes towards the operator seem to differ within this, with some feeling ‘cheated’ by the operator, whereas others felt that it may have been an honest mistake and would trust the operator to put it right.

1). It’s fair, I placed the bet and was correct, so therefore I am owed the money (c. 55% of those who agreed)

“If in the occasion I believe I should have been paid for a winning bet, I would feel entitled to the winnings and so would feel I had to right to complain.”

“If I believed that I should have had winnings, I would expect the company to explain why I haven’t received my winnings. If I was then proved right I would expect the winnings asap.”

2). The feeling of being ‘cheated’ by the gambling operator is prominent (c. 12% of those who agreed)

“Because I think they are trying to fool me.”

“I feel I am right to complaint, but big organisations and likely to have loop-holes and small print to not pay”

3). A number of respondents felt it may have been an honest mistake by the operator, so would trust them to put it right (c. 9% of those who agreed)

“I would complain to them in the first instance as it could be a delayed payment caused by a computer glitch and explained and rectified by them”

“I believe in giving the gaming company the chance to rectify the issue. Most gaming operators in the UK are regulated, therefore more likely to be fair in dealing with problems.”

Across both those who agreed and disagreed that they would make a complaint in this situation, around 150 respondents felt that they’d query this with an operator informally first, to give them the chance to explain and put the situation right.

Reasons for disagreeing to make a complaint to the gambling company

Very few respondents disagreed to making a complaint overall (c. 60 respondents), but among those that did, there was a feeling that respondents would not be taken seriously, and that if the bet didn’t come through it simply meant that they did not win.

1). Some respondents felt that they wouldn’t be taken seriously so there would be ‘no point’ in putting a complaint forward (c. 23% of those who disagreed)

“I don’t think they would take me serious”

“I don’t think my complaint would be taken seriously- if I gamble it’s only very small amounts, so hardly worth a complaint.”

“I don’t think it would help me at all”

2). Others felt that it was not the companies responsibility, if the bet didn’t come through then it is assumed to be correct and therefore they didn’t win the bet (c. 25% of those who disagreed).

“The scenario implies that it is an expected win, not an actual win - I would feel ridiculous making a complaint about something that wasn't even accurate”

“No point, clearly it wasn’t a winner. If it was then I would of received the money.”

Across both those who agreed and disagreed that they would make a complaint in this situation, around 150 respondents felt that they’d query this with an operator informally first, to give them the chance to explain and put the situation right.

Attitudes surrounding the complaints process

Attitudes surrounding the complaints process scenario 2 - a bar chart made up of 6 vertical bars. Each bar is broken down into the percentage of people who strongly agree, agree, neither, disagree, strongly disagree or don't know.

I don't think the gambling company would take my complaint seriouslyI would prefer to complain to an independent body, rather than directly to the gambling companyI expect the experience of making a complaint to have a satisfactory outcomeI would expect my money to be refunded if my complaint was upheldIf I received a positive outcome from the complaint, it would give me the confidence to make a complaint again in future if I had a problemIf I received a refund, I would use the money to gamble again
Strongly Agree7%13%38%57%49%8%
Agree20%17%30%21%29%12%
Neither24%31%15%9%12%30%
Disagree19%16%3%2%1%9%
Strongly Disagree14%10%3%2%1%22%
Don't Know16%13%11%9%8%20%
Source: Yonder Quarterly Online Tracker - June 2021 Base: n=1480 Respondents aged 18+ who have gambled in the past 12 months

Consumers appear to be more confident in their attitudes compared to the earlier scenario, with 68% of consumers agreeing that they expect the experience of making a complaint to have a satisfactory outcome. Similar to the previous scenario, many gamblers agree that a successful outcome from the complaint would give them the confidence to make a complaint again in future, if they had a problem (78%).

Previous section
Consumer Perceptions of the Complaints Process: Scenario 1
Next section
Consumer Perceptions of the Complaints Process: How consumers would use money if they received a refund
Is this page useful?
Back to top