Cookies on the Gambling Commission website

The Gambling Commission website uses cookies to make the site work better for you. Some of these cookies are essential to how the site functions and others are optional. Optional cookies help us remember your settings, measure your use of the site and personalise how we communicate with you. Any data collected is anonymised and we do not set optional cookies unless you consent.

Set cookie preferences

You've accepted all cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Skip to main content

Consultation response

Financial key event reporting: Reporting changes in ownership and interests: Consultation response

The consultation response on reporting changes in ownership and interests as a key event.

Contents


Business impacts and implementation

In our consultation we invited respondents to comment on any difficulties that they foresaw in complying with each proposed changes and these views have been summarised above. We also asked respondents to provide an estimate of the costs associated with implementing these proposals.

Consultation question

Please provide an estimate, including any evidence, of the direct costs associated with implementing these proposals, identifying to which proposals the estimated costs relate. Please give us your evidence below.

Respondents’ views

None of the respondents provided an estimate of costs involved in implementing the proposals. A few respondents stated that it was not possible to provide an estimate until the changes were finalised as there were too many unknowns.

One respondent stated that raising the reporting threshold from 3 percent to 5 percent for the reporting of direct share capital would appropriately decrease costs. On the other hand, they believed that should additional reporting of voting rights, dividend and/or profit entitlements, and so on, especially of indirect participants, become necessary, the associated costs might increase exponentially.

Our position

We have taken on board all the views expressed on the business impact of implementing the proposed changes in determining how we will proceed in relation to each proposal and are satisfied that our approach is proportionate and will reduce some regulatory burdens.

Previous section
Equalities considerations
Is this page useful?
Back to top