Cookies on the Gambling Commission website

The Gambling Commission website uses cookies to make the site work better for you. Some of these cookies are essential to how the site functions and others are optional. Optional cookies help us remember your settings, measure your use of the site and personalise how we communicate with you. Any data collected is anonymised and we do not set optional cookies unless you consent.

Set cookie preferences

You've accepted all cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Skip to main content

Report

Understanding the adverse consequences of gambling: the role of gambling activity

The Gambling Commission's report on gambling activity and demographic differences in risk of adverse consequences.

  1. Contents
  2. Background

Background

One of the Gambling Commission’s key evidence priorities is to build our understanding of how gambling harms are experienced and who is most at risk. To help achieve this, we developed a set of survey questions, within the Gambling Survey for Great Britain (GSGB), that measure a range of adverse consequences from gambling. These consequences are grouped into 2 categories:

  • Potential adverse consequences, which vary in severity and often have cumulative effects. Examples include cutting back on everyday spending and experiencing conflict with family
  • Severe consequences, which are unequivocally harmful. For example, relationship breakdown and crime.

Previous analysis of GSGB data showed that adverse consequences from gambling were most prevalent among males, younger participants, people from ethnic minority backgrounds, and those living in lower income households. In this report, we explored whether the increased susceptibility to adverse consequences in these higher-risk groups can be explained by differences in the types of gambling activities that they play. 

Previous section
Summary - Adverse consequences
Next section
Method  - Adverse consequences
Is this page useful?
Back to top