Cookies on the Gambling Commission website

The Gambling Commission website uses cookies to make the site work better for you. Some of these cookies are essential to how the site functions and others are optional. Optional cookies help us remember your settings, measure your use of the site and personalise how we communicate with you. Any data collected is anonymised and we do not set optional cookies unless you consent.

Set cookie preferences

You've accepted all cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Skip to main content

Guidance

The 2026 money laundering and terrorist financing risks within the British gambling industry

The Gambling Commission's money laundering and terrorist financing risk assessment of the British gambling industry for 2026.

  1. Contents
  2. 12 - Bingo (non-remote)

12 - Bingo (non-remote)

Sector rating

Sector Previous overall risk rating Current overall risk rating
Bingo (non-remote) Medium Medium

Non-remote bingo as a sector continues to be rated as medium risk for money laundering.

Bingo as a product presents limited risk for money laundering exploitation, however risks associated with monitoring customers in a live premises environment remain in the sector, including the monitoring of gaming machine activity.

The gross gambling yield (GGY) for the non-remote bingo sector for the period April 2024 to March 2025 was £650.4 million. Of this, £424 million was generated through gaming machine activity1.

When gaming machines are used in conjunction with ticket-in-ticket-out machines and automatic ticket redemption machines, there is a risk that staff have less oversight of the transactions.

Many bingo premises operate a membership system. This control can aid in verifying the identity of customers and tracking their activity. In premises where a membership system is not operated, the potential risk posed by anonymous customers is heightened. Bingo licensees who operate AGC-style premises should consider all relevant money laundering and terrorist financing risks to the premises, including those noted in the bingo and arcade sections of this risk assessment.

Risks

Vulnerability Risk Likelihood of event occurring Impact of event occurring Overall risk Change in risk
Operator Control Operators failing to comply with prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing legislation and guidance Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) No change
Operator Control Lack of competence of key personnel and licence holders which can be exploited by criminals seeking to launder the proceeds of crime Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) New risk
Operator Control Inadequate know your customer (KYC) checks conducted resulting in criminals laundering criminal proceeds - including failure to obtain additional information following a risk-based approach Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) No change (new wording)
Operator Control Inadequate due diligence checks on business-to-business relationships or business investors resulting in receipt of illicit funds Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) No change (new wording)
Operator Control Lack of appropriate customer and transaction monitoring. This includes monitoring play on gaming machines, and across different products Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) New risk
Operator Control Lack of closed-loop system Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) New risk
Operator Control Training for staff is insufficient and is not appropriately tailored Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) New risk
Operator Control Premises converted from adult gaming centres (AGC) - these premises may have anonymous customers Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) New risk
Customer Customer gambles at multiple premises or operators to disguise the source of their funds Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) New risk
Means of Payment Ticket-in-ticket-out (TITO) facilities used to launder funds when used in conjunction with Automatic Ticket Redemptions machines (ATR) Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) No change
Means of Payment Cash transactions - this includes the risk of dyed and counterfeit notes Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) No change (new wording)
Means of Payment Scottish banknotes Low (1) Medium (2) Low (2) No change
Product Electronic Bingo Terminals (EBTs) including table-top gaming (either traditionally or via EBT content) Low (1) Medium (2) Low (2) No change
Product Gaming machines used to launder criminal funds Medium (2) Medium (2) Medium (4) Increase in likelihood

Commission-controlled risks

Vulnerability Risk Likelihood of event occurring Impact of event occurring Overall risk Change in risk
Licensing and integrity Gambling operations being acquired by organised crime to launder criminal proceeds Low (1) Medium (2) Medium (3) No change

Case studies

Scottish banknotes
Scottish banknotes were placed in machines with the potential aim of being paid out in English notes or by using a debit card. In one case, customers placed approximately £6,000 in Scottish notes into gaming machines in a premise.

Gaming machines
A Commission investigation found that a licensed operator did not have appropriate systems in place to monitor customer activity on B3 gaming machines, as the monitoring reports did not allow the operator to assess customers’ overall spend.

A customer employed by a cash-intensive business used cash to load a gaming machine, but after minimal play requested funds be paid back to their debit card.

Previous section
2026 money laundering and risks - Bingo (remote)
Next section
2026 money laundering and risks - Gambling software (remote and non-remote)
Is this page useful?
Back to top