Cookies on the Gambling Commission website

The Gambling Commission website uses cookies to make the site work better for you. Some of these cookies are essential to how the site functions and others are optional. Optional cookies help us remember your settings, measure your use of the site and personalise how we communicate with you. Any data collected is anonymised and we do not set optional cookies unless you consent.

Set cookie preferences

You've accepted all cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Skip to main content

Guidance

Advisory Board for Safer Gambling (ABSG) advice on proposals for a voluntary code on deposit thresholds

ABSG has given advice to the Gambling Commission in regards to the introduction of an industry measure using net deposit thresholds.

Appendix

Table 2: Summary of Gambling Commission proposals on financial risk checks (July 2023)

Summary of Gambling Commission proposals on financial risk checks (July 2023)
Key financial risk for consumers Category of assessment Proposed thresholds for consultation – 25 years old and over Proposed thresholds for consultation – under 25 years old Proposed net loss definition Notes – other key aspects of proposals
Significant financial vulnerability for example bankruptcy Light touch check using public data, and some aggregated data £125 net loss per rolling 30 days or £500 per rolling 365 days £125 net loss per rolling 30 days or £500 per rolling 365 days Loss of deposited monies with an operator, not counting restaked winnings or bonus funds Check need not be repeated within 12 months
Gambling and deposits may continue while check taking place
General data protection considerations apply
Binge gambling Enhanced assessment £1000 net loss per rolling 24-hour period £500 net loss per rolling 24-hour period As with significant financial vulnerability
In addition, positive net position in preceding 7 days may be taken into account
Check need not be repeated within 6 months
Gambling may continue, further deposits halted
Particular requirements for data protection considerations
Significant losses over time Enhanced assessment £2,000 net loss in rolling 90 days £1,000 net loss in rolling 90 days As with significant financial vulnerability
In addition, positive net position in preceding 7 days may be taken into account
Check need not be repeated within 6 months
Gambling may continue, further deposits halted
Particular requirements for data protection considerations

Table 3: Canadian lower risk gambling guidelines 2021

View the original Lower-Risk Gambling Guidelines poster (opens in new tab).

Guideline 1: Gamble no more than 1 percent of household income

Do not bet more than 1 percent of your household income before tax per month. For example, someone with a household income of $70,000 before tax should gamble no more than $58 per month.

The following table shows how much you can gamble each month to follow this guideline.

How much you can gamble each month to follow guideline 1
Yearly household income Maximum monthly amount
$10,000 $8
$20,000 $17
$40,000 $33
$70,000 $58
$80,000 $67
$100,000 $83
$120,000 $100
$130,000 $108

Guideline 2: Gamble no more than 4 days per month

The guidelines suggest you do not gamble more than 4 times a month. This works out to roughly once a week.

For the Lower-Risk Gambling Guidelines to help individuals lower their risk of experiencing harms from gambling, they must follow all 3 guidelines at the same time and not be selective about which guidelines to follow when gambling.

Guideline 3: Avoid regularly gambling at more than 2 types of games

If you gamble on a regular basis, do not play at more than 2 types of games.

Familiar types of gambling games include:

  • lotteries
  • sports betting
  • table games (such as roulette, poker blackjack, craps)
  • slot machines
  • scratch tickets
  • horse racing
  • bingo
  • Video Lottery Terminals (VLTs)
  • online forms of gambling like poker or slot machines.

Special risk populations and contextual factors

If you have experienced any of the following risk factors, then these limits may not be suitable for you:

  • problems from alcohol, cannabis or other drug use
  • problems with anxiety or depression
  • personal or family history of gambling problems or substance use disorders.

In these instances, you should consider gambling less than these guidelines recommend or not at all.

Gambling Type

The type of gambling games you play makes a difference.

Fast-paced games that involve frequent betting can more quickly lead to problems. With slot machines, electronic gaming machines, poker and many online forms of gambling, people can spend a lot of money in a short time.

Table 4: Change in risk from reference group occurring when gambling expenditure per month predicts financial, relationship, emotional and psychological, and health harms

Total sample size is 59,099.

Change in risk from reference group occurring when gambling expenditure per month predicts financial, relationship, emotional and psychological, and health harms
Type of harm and the risk associated Gambling expenditure (percentage) per month
Less than or equal to 0.10% 0.11 to 0.50% 0.51 to 1.0% 1.1 to 2.0% 2.1 to 3.0% 3.1 to 4.0% 4.1 to 5.0% 5.1% and higher
Sample size in category 17,634 15,926 7,708 6,250 2,988 1,700 1,082 5,811
Financial harm
Sample reporting harm 335 535 429 507 337 221 144 1,510
Percentage reporting harm 1.9% 3.4% 5.6% 8.1% 11.3% 13.0% 13.3% 26.0%
Relative risk N/A 1.8 3.0 4.3 5.9 6.8 7.0 13.7
Relationship harm
Sample reporting harm 173 249 207 287 178 129 99 1,045
Percentage reporting harm 1.0% 1.6% 2.7% 4.6% 6.0% 7.6% 9.1% 18.0%
Relative risk N/A 1.6 2.7 4.7 6.1 7.7 9.3 18.3
Emotional and/or psychological harm
Sample reporting harm 441 638 460 616 374 250 178 1,551
Percentage reporting harm 2.5% 4.0% 6.0% 9.9% 12.5% 14.7% 16.5% 26.7%
Relative risk N/A 1.6 2.4 3.9 5.0 5.9 6.6 10.7
Health harm
Sample reporting harm 142 221 157 219 133 87 76 776
Percentage reporting harm 0.8% 1.4% 2.0% 3.5 4.5% 5.1% 7.0% 13.4%
Relative risk N/A 1.6 2.5 4.4 5.5 6.4 8.7 16.6
Previous section
Our recommendation - ABSG advice on proposals for a voluntary code on deposit thresholds
Is this page useful?
Back to top