The Gambling Commission website uses cookies to make the site work better for you. Some of these cookies are essential to how the site functions and others are optional. Optional cookies help us remember your settings, measure your use of the site and personalise how we communicate with you. Any data collected is anonymised and we do not set optional cookies unless you consent.

Set cookie preferences

You've accepted all cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Skip to main content

Report

Progress Report on the National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms

ABSG progress report 2020

Prevention and education

The National Strategy seeks a clear collective prevention plan, applying the right mix of interventions and targeting prevention activity where it will have the most impact.

Prevention and Education – Summary of progress

Strengths

  • Strengthened LCCP requirements – banning the use of credit cards for online gambling, stronger customer interaction requirements and mandating membership of GAMSTOP.
  • Action by banks and financial sector to offer transaction blocking – and partnership work with Money and Mental Health Institute.
  • City-wide public health prevention programmes with involvement of people with lived experience launched in Glasgow and Greater Manchester.
  • Activity piloted to raise awareness of risks of gambling in children and young people – e.g. ParentZone, FastForward, Programme-A, YGAM and PSHE Association.
  • Public Health England are conducting an evidence review – which is a key step to determining the role to be played by statutory bodies in England.

Weaknesses

  • Lack of prevention, early stage detection of harms and evaluation of outcomes.
  • Limited action required to address suicide prevention.
  • Lack of whole systems public health approach.
  • More action required to reduce risks to children and young people – e.g. greater focus on gambling-like features within video games.
  • Inconsistent local authority level data on which to base targeted interventions.
  • Much activity is still at pilot stage and, if evaluation proves they are effective, challenges to spread and scalability.
  • Delays to the publication of evidence reviews and subsequent actions
Next section
Summary of progress
Is this page useful?
Back to top