With this document you can:

This box is not visible in the printed version.

Gambling Survey for Great Britain - Wave 4, September 2025 to January 2026 report: Official statistics

Gambling Survey for Great Britain - Wave 4, September 2025 to January 2026 report

Published: 4 June 2026

Last updated: 4 June 2026

This version was printed or saved on: 4 June 2026

Online version: https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/report/gambling-survey-for-great-britain-wave-4-september-2025-to-january-2026-report-official-statistics

Content of this report

This report contains detail of the response rates achieved and weighting strategy for Wave 4, 2025 of the Gambling Survey for Great Britain (GSGB), which was carried out between 22 September 2025 and 18 January 2026.

Detail on the background to the survey, the methodology, sampling strategy, and questionnaire content are provided in the Gambling Survey for Great Britain - technical report.

Data tables are provided in Statistics on gambling participation – Wave 4, September 2025 to January 2026.

Response to the survey

Address-level response rates

In total, 22,302 addresses were issued. In remote surveys (that is where participants complete the survey independently without any involvement from an interviewer), no information is known about the reason for non-response in individual addresses. However, it was assumed that around 9 percent of addresses in the sample (2,007) were not residential and were therefore ineligible to complete the survey1.

In total, 3,688 addresses were productive. The adjusted address-level response rate, that is the proportion of eligible addresses where a questionnaire was completed by at least one adult, was 18 percent (lower than the target of 22 percent). There was no response from 16,568 addresses and a further 39 addresses had an individual contact the office to say they did not wish or were unable to take part.

Table A.1: (Address-level response rates) summarises this.

Table A.1: Address-level response rates

Table A.1: Address-level response
Response of issued addresses Total addresses (number) Total addresses (percentage) Total eligible (percentage)
Issued addresses 22,302 100% Not applicable
Assumed ineligible 2,007 9% Not applicable
Assumed eligible (residential addresses) 20,295 91% 100%
Refusal or unable to take part 39 0% 0%
No response 16,568 74% 82%
Productive addresses 3,688 17% 18%

Table A.2 (Address-level response, by country and Government Office Region) shows the breakdown of the issued sample in England, Scotland, and Wales, and English regions and the household response rate in each country and region. In total, 86 percent of the issued addresses were in England, 9 percent in Scotland and 5 percent in Wales. The household response rate was 18 percent in England, 19 percent in Scotland and 19 percent in Wales. In English regions2, the highest response rate was achieved in the South West (22 percent) and the lowest in London (14 percent).

Table A.2: Address-level response, by country and Government office region

Table A.2 Address-level response, by country and government office region
Country and/or Government office region Total issued addresses (number) Total issued addresses (percentage) Total assumed eligible addresses (number) Total assumed eligible addresses (percentage) Total productive addresses (number) Household response rate (percentage)
England 19,147 86% 17,424 86% 3,154 18%
North East 974 4% 886 4% 157 18%
North West 2,589 12% 2,356 12% 409 17%
Yorkshire and the Humber 1,881 8% 1,712 8% 301 18%
East Midlands 1,654 7% 1,505 7% 282 19%
West Midlands 1,956 9% 1,780 9% 328 18%
East of England 2,115 9% 1,925 9% 345 18%
London 2,868 13% 2,610 13% 365 14%
South East 3,092 14% 2,814 14% 569 20%
South West 2,018 9% 1,836 9% 398 22%
Scotland 2,042 9% 1,858 9% 346 19%
Wales 1,113 5% 1,013 5% 188 19%
All addresses 22,302 100% 20,295 100% 3,688 18%

Individual-level response rates

Following the process of removing duplicate responses3, cases deemed to have completed the online questionnaire too quickly to have properly engaged with the questions, and cases above the maximum 2 completions per household4, it was assumed that all responses in the dataset were from 5,210 unique individuals who had completed the questionnaire.

In total, 44 percent of the responding unweighted sample were male, and 56 percent were female, as shown in Table A.3 (Individual-level response, by sex and age). This under-representation of males is similar to that seen in the latest published results for other surveys with the same completion modes, for example, the British Social Attitudes (BSA) 2022 survey - BSA 40 Technical details (opens in new tab)(pdf). In total, 44 percent of the BSA 2022 unweighted main sample were male and 56 percent female.

Those in the youngest age group were the least likely to take part: 6 percent of responding adults were aged 18 to 24 years, whereas this age group makes up 11 percent of the adult population of Great Britain. Conversely, 18 percent of responding adults were aged 65 to 74 years, whereas this group makes up 12 percent of the population. (Table A.3 Individual-level response, by age and sex).

This difference in taking part was particularly pronounced among male participants aged 18 to 24 years and 25 to 34 years. Men aged 18 to 24 years accounted for 6 percent of the male sample (this age-sex group makes up 11 percent of the male adult population of Great Britain). Men aged 25 to 34 years made up 5 percent of the male sample compared with the 17 percentage of the male adult population. The equivalent proportions for females were 7 percent in the sample and 10 percent in the population aged 18 to 24 years, and 16 percent and 17 percent respectively for those aged 25 to 34 years. The national percentages are based on the 2023 mid-year population estimates for Great Britain: Estimates of the population for the UK, England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) (opens in a new tab).

Table A.3: Individual-level response, by age and sex

Table A.3 Individual-level response, by sex and age
Age group (years) Total participants: male (percentage) Total participants: female (percentage) Total participants: all (percentage) Total Great Britain population: adult males (percentage) Total Great Britain population: adult females (percentage) Total Great Britain population: all adults (percentage)
18 to 24 6% 7% 6% 11% 10% 11%
25 to 34 12% 16% 14% 17% 17% 17%
35 to 44 16% 16% 16% 17% 17% 17%
45 to 54 14% 15% 15% 16% 16% 16%
55 to 64 18% 17% 17% 16% 16% 16%
65 to 74 19% 17% 18% 12% 12% 12%
75 and over 16% 12% 14% 11% 13% 12%
All participants 44% 56% 100% 48% 52% 100%
Unweighted bases (number) 2,290 2,913 5,203 25,521,421 27,191,262 52,712,683

Table A.4: (Individual-level response, by mode of completion and sex) shows response rates by mode of completion, overall and for males and females separately. Overall, 69 percent (3,5895) completed the survey online and 31 percent (1,6146) completed a postal questionnaire. These results are broadly in line with expectations, based on development stages of the GSGB.

Table A.4: Individual-level response, by mode of completion and sex

Table A.4: Individual-level response, by mode of completion and sex
Sex Individual-level response: Online completions (percentage) Individual-level response: Postal completions (percentage) Individual-level response: Total completions (percentage) Individual-level response: Total completions (number)
Males 69% 31% 44% 2,290
Females 69% 31% 56% 2,913
All participants 69% 31% 100% 5,203
Unweighted bases (number) 3,589 1,614 5,203 5,203

There was little difference between males and females in the mode of completion. In all age groups, except those aged 75 and over, a higher proportion of participants completed the survey online than filled in the postal questionnaire. Of those aged 75 and over, 33 percent completed the survey online compared with between 51 percent and 91 percent of those in the younger age groups as shown in Table A.5 (Individual-level response, by mode of completion and age).

Table A.5: Individual-level response, by mode of completion and age

Table A.5: Individual-level response, by mode of completion and age
Age group (years) Individual-level response: Online completions (percentage) Individual-level response: Postal completions (percentage) Individual-level response: Total completions (number)
18 to 24 89% 11% 330
25 to 34 91% 9% 729
35 to 44 88% 12% 836
45 to 54 78% 22% 774
55 to 64 65% 35% 896
65 to 74 51% 49% 919
75 and over 33% 67% 726
All participants 69% 31% 5,210
Unweighted bases (number) 3,592 1,618 5,210

The mode of survey completion was similar for those who participated in gambling in the past 4 weeks and those who did not, with 71 percent of those who participated in gambling in the past 4 weeks completing the survey online and 69 percent of those who did not, as shown in Table A.6 (Individual-level response, by mode of completion and gambling participation in the past 4 weeks).

Table A.6: Individual-level response, by mode of completion and gambling participation in the past 4 weeks

Table A.6: Individual-level response, by mode of completion and gambling participation in the past 4 weeks
Gambling prevalence in the past 4 weeks Individual-level response: Online completions (percentage) Individual-level response: Postal completions (percentage) Individual-level response: Total completions (number)
Gambled in the past 4 weeks 71% 29% 2,366
Not gambled in the past 4 weeks 69% 31% 2,766
Unweighted bases (number) 3,586 1,546 5,132

1When estimating the proportion of ineligible addresses on an online survey, it is best practice to assume the same ineligibility rate as a recent face-to-face survey which uses the same sample frame and sampling approach and for which detailed outcomes are known for the entire issued sample. Ineligibility rates in Postcode Address File (PAF) face-to-face surveys tend to fall between 8 percent and 10 percent and 9 percent is the rate recorded in the most recent face-to-face British Social Attitudes Survey (2019) and so has been used as an appropriate default for this survey.

2Regions are shown only for England because the sample is so big, and the Scotland and Wales samples are equivalent to the size of an English region.

3Where a single participant completed the survey a second time.

4Where more than 2 people in a household completed the survey (for example, 2 completing the survey online and 2 different people completing postal questionnaires.

5Including 3 participants where sex could not be derived.

6Including 4 participants where sex could not be derived.

Questionnaire completion times

Table A.7 (Online questionnaire completion time, by gambling status in the past 4 weeks) shows the online questionnaire completion time. The aim was for the online questionnaire to take an average of 20 minutes to complete. The mean time taken was 23 minutes: 27 minutes for those who had gambled in the past 4 weeks and 19 minutes for those who had not gambled in the past 4 weeks. The median time taken was lower than the mean: 17 minutes for all participants, 21 minutes for those who had gambled in the past 4 weeks and 14 minutes for those who had not gambled in the past 4 weeks1.

Table A.7: Online questionnaire completion time, by gambling status in the past 4 weeks

Table A.7: Online questionnaire completion time, by gambling status in the past 4 weeks
Gambling prevalence in the past 4 weeks Mean (minutes) Median (minutes)
All participants completing online 23 17
Gambled in the past 4 weeks 27 21
Not gambled in the past 4 weeks 19 14
Unweighted bases (number) 3,534 3,534

1Participant’s completion times were calculated by summing the time taken to answer each question that they answered, but with the time for each question capped at the high outlier value for that question.

Weighting strategy

The data was weighted to take account of non-response, bias, and improve representativeness. As there was no disproportionate sampling, selection weights were not required. The weighting method consisted of 2 stages:

  1. A logistic regression model for number of responses within a household (run for households with more than one eligible adult).
  2. A calibration to population estimates.

For the first stage, forward and backward stepwise logistic regression models were used to test which variables were predictive of the number of responses within a household. These models were run only for households with more than one eligible adult. Area-level variables (from the 2021 census for England and Wales and the 2011 census for Scotland) and household-level variables were tested. Where both a household level and area level version of a given characteristic was available, the household-level version was used, for example, if household income and Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) were both predictive of the number of responses, only household income was used. The final regression model included all variables that were significant in the stepwise regressions these were; percentage of owner occupiers in the area, number of children in the household, household tenure, household income, population density, percentage of persons who are economically active in the area. Region of residence was also included in the model to control for any regional differences in survey response.

The predicted probabilities from this model were used to create response weights for households with more than one eligible adult. The weight was checked for outliers and left untrimmed. The weight for responding households with only one eligible adult was set to one.

The response weight was then calibrated to estimates of the eligible population, that is, residents of Great Britain aged 18 years and over. Calibration weighting adjusts the weight so that characteristics of the weighted achieved sample match population estimates, reducing bias. The following variables were included in the calibration: age categories by sex, region, IMD percentiles (quintiles for England and bitiles for Wales and Scotland), tenure, and ethnicity.

Estimates of the Great Britain population by age, sex, and region of residence were taken from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) mid-year population estimates (opens in new tab), which were for 2023 in the UK.

Population estimates for IMD percentiles within each country were taken from ONS England and Wales (opens in new tab) and National Records of Scotland (opens in new tab). Population estimates for tenure and ethnicity were taken from the most recent Labour Force Survey (opens in new tab) data available, which was gathered between January and March 2024.

After calibration, the weight was checked for outliers and left untrimmed. The final weight for the 5,210 productive individuals has a design effect of 1.27, an effective sample size of 4,095, and efficiency of 79 percent.